Monday, May 18, 2009
Sunday, May 17, 2009
男女之间是否有纯友谊 2
(请看男女之间是否有纯友谊)
今天又无端端的回到这老掉牙的话题
无他
有朋友在pm上放了一下这段字
男+女=男女朋友，男+女≠普通朋友/知己， 男+女=男女朋友/不是朋友/不是知己 你觉得是如此吗？
来到这里
我只能说
在时下年轻人对爱情的开放程度，我无言了
男生泡妞5误区大公开 [ 转贴 ]
一、总以为丑女好泡
男生泡妞5误区
我有一位大学同学，因为自身条件很不好，所以他就去泡全校最丑的一位女生，结果泡了大半年也没泡到，遭到对方n次地拒绝，并被很多人嗤之以鼻。后来在我的提醒下，他把他那锲而不舍的精神用来追求一位“千人瞩目”的“系花”，结果一个月之后就搞定。
我想说的是，有些长相一般的女人对自己太不自信，从而导致了爱情良知的缺失，她们总不相信这个世界上真的会有男人来主动追求地她们，即便是有了，她们也会毫无理由的将姿态放得很高很高，努力想要获得比那些美女更多的荣耀和自尊。
我觉得这么做，很容易让她们患上心理上与智力上的双重疾病——这就是导致丑女难泡的心理因素与智力因素。
二、总以为处女都是纯洁的
世上只有一半的处女能够保持肉体和精神上的双处女，而剩下那另一半的处女也就有一层光鲜的处女膜，在精神上，她们比非处还要非处。
有些处女结婚前谈了很多次恋爱，跟很多人都睡过觉，五花八门的性游戏全都见识过了，每当男人想要捅破她的下半身，她就大喊“暂停”。如果有谁将她作为婚姻的筹码那将是可笑的。
三、总以为送上门的都是烂货
有很多人总是以为一些送上门来让自己白玩的女人都是别人玩剩下来的烂货，其实这是男人们对女人们的最大误会。今天我想说的是：那些真正的垃圾女人是绝对不会送上门来让你白玩的!她们对男人会百般刁难，提出种种借口与条件逃避一次又一次的牵手、亲吻和性爱。
无论是送上门的女人还是我们自己辛苦寻得的女人，她们都是平等的，都值得我们用心去爱。
四、总以为有钱就能通吃
前天晚上我在酒吧买醉，跟朋友喝了几瓶洋酒，与身边的一位陪酒女郎玩了很多猜拳游戏，于是她跟我就似乎有了“感情”。
我心里明白，这样的女人全部可以用金钱来换取，所以我觉得她们并不珍贵。世上凡是可以用货币来购买的商品都算不上珍贵。世上有很多女人都不吃金钱这一套，真正有本事的男人找的都是这样的女人。有很多男人动不动就鄙视某女人财迷心窍，那其实清楚地说明了他本人的无能。
古人视金钱如粪土，我认为他们是在说慌。只有当女人爱上男人的时候，金钱才真正地成了粪土。
五、总以为长得帅就有魅力
即便我本人长得不算难看，我还是要这么说。所谓的帅哥之所以到最后总没有好的下场，是因为他们一开始就动用了自己的色相。女人，在长大之后，她们总会选择有内涵的男人，而不是一个弱不禁风的软腿帅哥。
漂亮女人，无论被多少人玷污过，依然谁都想要;漂亮男人，被人玩到最后，肚子大了，谁都不想要。男人长得帅绝对没有错，只要你不将它当做武器或资本，因为感情不是以帅作为衡量尺度的。
Saturday, May 16, 2009
捉黄脚鸡
原来我这部落格
竟然被友人发现了！！
不得不敬佩这位友人
不知道他从何得知我这个部落格
但是
请你别再偷偷摸摸的潜水了 （虽然我天天这样子做）
因为我已知道你的身份了
顺带一提
不晓得你有没有兴奋到四周围和别人宣传我的部落格
然后邀请大家一起潜水
其实
我无任欢迎认识我而又潜水的朋友来这里看
但是
请告诉我你在潜水
而不是以为神不知，鬼不觉
对了！！
说的就是你！！
自动献身报道
不然的话。。。以后有什么事情别怪我咯。。 呵呵
Thursday, May 14, 2009
哪种女孩最好‘骗’??
一、会凝视着你而说话的女孩：是位内心热情，对爱情会采取积极行动的女孩。
二、与你单独相处时，不论天气炎热与否，手心会冒汗的女孩：对你有好感，使得汗腺的分泌异常。
三、与你走一齐，在不知不觉中会走到你左侧的女孩：对你有一份依赖感。
四、很在意衣服及裙子的下摆，坐下时会特别用手去整理一下的女孩：是为吸引你特别注意动作，与你见面时是心存复杂的心态，会以高傲的姿态与你会话。
五、谈话时，会不时的用「噢」好喜欢、「噢」好可爱，会出现许多「噢」的女孩：内心并不若表面上那般文雅，而是另有所思，心胸也不是很宽广的女孩。
六、对稍为脱轨或不经心而说出的话，会伸伸舌头、耸耸肩的女孩：是在对你放电，释出魅力的举动。
七、眼送秋波的女孩：是对你有强烈的好意，情欲强，且很会吃醋的女孩。
八、在说话时会将手中的物品紧捏又拉开的女孩：心绪浮动、紧张，也是正等待着你甜言蜜语的动作。
九、无论说什麽都面无表情的女孩：是难以交往的女孩，如果五分钟内无法改变其表情，那麽准备走人或落跑吧！
十、会一直假装听不懂你在说什麽的女孩：如不是太过单纯，就是有丰富的异性交友经验的女孩。
十一、会避开你的眼光而说话的女孩：是相当在乎你，不但嫉妒心强，也常是心口不一的女孩。
十二、与你面对面说话时，声音不同於平常或者声音会有点模糊不清时：她相当在乎你，是纯情的女孩，盼望着你能适时的打开恋情。
十叁、与你说话时，会退缩在角落也不愿移到较舒服位置的女孩：是不太会体谅别人的人，你所面对的是很难追到的女孩。
十四、言谈流利，话题丰富有趣的女孩：为吸引你，而刻意散发出来的轻松快乐感，是一位感受敏锐、逻辑力很强的女孩。
十五、会在你前面扭捏作态的女孩：是意志力薄弱的女孩，也是只要多用心就能追到的女孩。
十六、打开话匣子就话不停的女孩：对於爱情缺乏耐心，却很想抓住你的女孩。
十七、无论说什麽，她都学过的女孩：有随时都会移情别恋的倾向。
十八、没什麽了不起的事就会泪眼汪汪，且会哭闹的女孩：是位心胸狭窄，但对你特别多情，也是会把你黏得紧紧的，让你有窒息感的女孩
Tuesday, May 12, 2009
我没有记忆
用一天的时间看完了 “孤岛少年的盛夏纪事”
作者是那天晴
马来西亚的作家
很道地的文字
充满着马来西亚的情感
马来西亚年轻人时下对爱情的价值观
在作家的笔下
是那么的真实平凡，却又那么的无奈
笔者把这本书献给所有对大学怀着梦想的年轻人
大学，就是趁年少輕狂的时候，干些疯狂事
套书中一句话 ：“十八到二十二岁这段期间，决定了你们将来一辈子”
McCurry vs McDonald's
and I have quoted a summary from one of the website :
McCurry restaurant is one of the local (Malaysia) fast food restaurant. 5 years ago, McDonald took legal against McCurry because of the prefix "Mc". 5 years later (Monday - 27th April 2009), McCurry won the case against McDonald after appealing. The news became world wide news on 29th and 30th April 2009.
FYI, the news is around the world!!
Should we say Malaysia Boleh? Or Malaysia Only Boleh in this kind of thing ?
Here is a copy from TheStar Online news:
PUTRAJAYA: Fast food chain McDonald’s Wednesday lost its exclusivity to the use of the prefix “Mc” when the Court of Appeal here allowed a local Indian food outlet, McCurry Restaurant, to use “Mc” in its business signage.
Appeal Court judges Datuk Gopal Sri Ram (now Federal Court judge), who sat with Justices Datuk Heliliah Mohd Yusof and Datuk Sulong Matjeraie, held that there was no evidence to show that McCurry Restaurant of Jalan Ipoh, Kuala Lumpur, was passing off McDonald’s business as its own.
“Where the learned judge, with respect, erred is to assume that McDonald’s had a monopoly in the use of the prefix ‘Mc’ on a signage or in the conduct of business.
“In my judgment, the irresistible inference to be drawn from the totality of the evidence is that McCurry’s Restaurant signboard would not result in reasonable persons associating McCurry with the McDonald’s mark.
“For the reasons given, I would allow McCurry Restaurant’s appeal and reverse the findings of the learned judge,” said Sri Ram in his 18-page written judgement.
He said the fact that McCurry Restaurant chose the name “McCurry,” could not, by itself, lead to the inference that it sought to obtain an unfair advantage from the usage of the prefix “Mc.”
“You have to look at the plaintiff’s (McDonald’s) getup or logo as a whole ... it consists of a distinctive golden arched ‘M’ with the word, McDonald’s, against a red background.
“The defendant’s (McCurry) signboard carried the words ‘Restoran McCurry’ with the lettering in white and grey on a red background with a picture of a chicken giving a double thumbsup and with the wording, ‘Malaysian Chicken Curry.’
“Thus, the defendant’s presentation of its business is in a style and getup which is distinctly different from that of the plaintiff,” said Sri Ram, adding that none of the food items on the menu card served at McCurry Restaurant carried the prefix ‘Mc’ unlike the items of food available at McDonald’s.
“It would have been different if McCurry Restaurant had offered to its customers, items that were labelled either the same as or similar to those sold by McDonald’s, for example McFish or McLamb,” he said.
Sri Ram also said that the type of food available at a McDonald’s outlet was very different as it served fast food whereas McCurry catered only typically Indian food.
“There is evidence to show that the type of customers who patronise the defendant’s outlet is very different from those who patronise the plaintiff’s several outlets,” he said, adding that the former was patronised by adults and senior citizens while the latter was mainly by children.
On Sept 7, 2006, the High Court held that the McDonald’s fast food chain, a household name among children, had the exclusive right to the prefix “Mc” and ordered McCurry Restaurant (KL) Sdn Bhd to pay damages to McDonald’s Corporation, the proprietor of the McDonald’s chain of restaurants.
In her ruling, Justice Siti Mariah Ahmad said by using the words “McCurry” and employing a signage which featured colours that were distinctive of McDonald’s, McCurry Restaurant was indulging in acts that could give rise to confusion and deception.
McDonald’s, in its statement of claim, said it created the prefix “Mc” as a trademark and that with the usage of the prefix “Mc,” together with the word “Curry,” McCurry Restaurant, which was formerly known as Restoran Penang Curry House (KL) Sdn Bhd, had misrepresented itself as being associated with McDonald’s business.
McCurry Restaurant, in its defence, contended that McDonald’s could not claim monopoly or exclusive rights to the use of the prefix “Mc,” as that prefix was extensively used around the world as surnames, particularly by people of Scottish origin.
McCurry Restaurant said the menu was essentially Malaysian and Indian cuisine consisting of teh tarik, roti canai, nasi lemak, nasi briyani, fish head curry, chicken tandorri, naan bread, tosai, chappati and various chicken and mutton curry dishes, which were totally different from those available in McDonald’s restaurants which comprise food typically found in western food restaurants such as burgers and french fries.
McDonald’s was represented by counsel S.F. Wong while counsel Sri Dev Nair appeared for McCurry. -- Bernama
and the news is from the link:
http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2009/4/29/nation/20090429182848&sec=nation
Monday, May 11, 2009
意外 “收获“
想说一天内就搞完Thesis hardbound
这里的搞完意思是 " 做hardcover + 交去office + 去找一些想见的coursemate 一次过见完" =)
没想到说去到复印店里
那位平时看上去老老实实， 面带笑容，和蔼可亲， 样貌娇好(个人认为) 的女人
竟然是个无良商人
如果想一天之内做好竟然要加钱！！！
这摆明就是坐地起价 ！！！
如果你不能一天内做完，你可以说今天不可能
为何要为难学生说要加钱呢？
算了，讲起就有点气
